Some questions that came to mind from this chapter dealt with the discussion on "shark attacking" and homophobic tendencies in the US military. The topic of military rests on a blurred gray line to me. There is no topic that is black or white. To start with, many people say why did that officer make that soldier do that specific operation, etc., but what people are forgetting is that the military is just one big chain of superiors. It was not the officers decision to send the troops into a certain mission, but a superior of a superior and so on's decision. The President is technically the "boss" of all these men and women. Many people in the military do not always agree with what they have to do, but they do it because that is what they are told to do. Here is where the gray line rests. The military consists of incredibly large amounts of paperwork and moving up the chain. The Army's motto is, "hurry up and wait". That is a large part of these soldiers lives.
Chasin mentions how sergeants call the soldiers names as an insulting maneuver in training. This is called "shark attacking". Drill sergeants are taught this in drill sergeant school. The maneuver is done to break the soldiers down and rebuild them into the soldier that they want. It is also used as a way to get people to listen and pay attention. While this may seem innapropriate, extreme, and cruel in a way, people have to remember becoming an infrantymen, transporter, etc. in the Army is not the same as working a 9-5 job in a cubicle. Soldiers have to be prepared to defend, protect, and at all costs possibly kill other human beings. The training that goes into this has to be extreme and different from any other organizations form of training. People forget the situations that these soldiers have to be put in. If you are not mentally tough enough than you are going to get yourself and others killed. The examples of names and terms used in shark attacking in Chasin's book are not nearly as bad as what I have heard soldiers talk about when it happened to them. Why sergeants find it ok to use racist and degrading terms is not exactly clear to me, but I am assuming a lot is ignorance. Not all of them do this, but it is still done.
As far as the "don't ask, don't tell" policy in the military I feel it is somewhat justified. The soldiers are placed into large rooms full of bunks and nothing else. There is no privacy or separation. The bathrooms are the same. There are no doors on the stalls or anything. So placing a person that is gay in a room full of people of the same sex could make the other people uncomfortable. I do not think it has anything to do with judgements against the person that is gay, just that the facilities provided to the soldiers are not equipped for providing privatization. It would be the same as putting women and men together in the same bathroom and "dorm room". There would be uncomfortableness among both parties. It is a touchy situation and hard to find a compromise that would work for both parties without someone being offended.